Added link to zlib v1.1.3 vulnerability#17156
Conversation
|
Hello, and thanks for your contribution! I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept this contribution by verifying everyone involved has signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA). Recognized GitHub usernameWe couldn't find a bugs.python.org (b.p.o) account corresponding to the following GitHub usernames: This might be simply due to a missing "GitHub Name" entry in one's b.p.o account settings. This is necessary for legal reasons before we can look at this contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue. You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received. Thanks again for the contribution, we look forward to reviewing it! |
|
Thanks for your time @nosahama, and welcome to CPython! I assume that you've seen the bot's message about the CLA? |
brandtbucher
left a comment
brandtbucher
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree that this is helpful. One minor comment:
I did that already, i don't know what it's not showing up, maybe eventual consistency 😅 |
|
Yeah, give it a business day or two. As I understand it, they're processed manually by a human at the PSF. |
This change adds a link to the vulnerability of the `zlib v1.1.3` library (double-free vulnerability). In my own opinion, i feel some curious people might find it handy.
|
CC @Yhg1s |
|
Sorry, I didn't see that this was merged. Congrats on your first CPython contribution @nosahama! 🍾 Looking forward to seeing more from you in the future. |
5 participants
This change adds a link to the vulnerability of the
zlib v1.1.3library (double-free vulnerability). In my own opinion, i feel some curious people might find it handy.